Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Respir Care ; 67(8): 1011-1021, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1964279

ABSTRACT

Prone positioning (PP) has been used extensively for patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for hypoxemic respiratory failure during the COVID-19 pandemic. Evidence suggests that PP was beneficial during the pandemic, as it improves oxygenation and might improve chances of survival, especially in those with a continuum of positive oxygenation responses to the procedure. Additionally, the pandemic drove innovation regarding PP, as it brought attention to awake PP (APP) and the value of an interdisciplinary team approach to PP during a pandemic. APP appears to be safe and effective at improving oxygenation; APP may also reduce the need for intubation in patients requiring advanced respiratory support like high-flow nasal cannula or noninvasive ventilation. Teams specifically assembled for PP during a pandemic also appear useful and can provide needed assistance to bedside clinicians in the time of crisis. Complications associated with PP can be mitigated, and a multidisciplinary approach to reduce the incidence of complications is recommended.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Noninvasive Ventilation , Respiratory Insufficiency , Humans , Noninvasive Ventilation/adverse effects , Pandemics , Patient Positioning/methods , Prone Position/physiology , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy
2.
AACN Adv Crit Care ; 32(2): 159-168, 2021 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1194731

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: As intensive care unit bed capacity doubled because of COVID-19 cases, nursing leaders created a prone team to support labor-intensive prone positioning of patients with COVID-related acute respiratory distress syndrome. The goal of the prone team was to reduce workload on intensive care teams, standardize the proning process, mitigate pressure injuries and turning-related adverse events, and ensure prone team safety. METHODS: Staff were trained using a hybrid learning model focused on prone-positioning techniques, pressure injury prevention, and turning-related adverse events. RESULTS: No adverse events occurred to patients or members of the prone team. The prone team mitigated pressure injuries using prevention strategies. The prone team and intensive care unit staff were highly satisfied with their experience. CONCLUSION: The prone team provided support for critically ill patients, and team members reported feeling supported and empowered. Intensive care unit staff were highly satisfied with the prone team.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , COVID-19/therapy , Critical Care/standards , Health Personnel/psychology , Patient Positioning/standards , Prone Position , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/epidemiology , Critical Care/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Positioning/psychology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , SARS-CoV-2 , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL